[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDOMVgwT2=iWAHOhgHSBY1B+KoWHQgCdK4idD2miwB=_eMs5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 12:30:42 -0400
From: Nick Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, fabf@...net.be,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Check for Null return of function of affs_bread in
function affs_truncate
Ok that's fine I would return as if it's a NULL the other parts of the
function can't continue.
Nick
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 06:08:05PM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
>> ---
>> fs/affs/file.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/affs/file.c b/fs/affs/file.c
>> index a7fe57d..f26482d 100644
>> --- a/fs/affs/file.c
>> +++ b/fs/affs/file.c
>> @@ -923,6 +923,8 @@ affs_truncate(struct inode *inode)
>>
>> while (ext_key) {
>> ext_bh = affs_bread(sb, ext_key);
>> + if (!ext_bh)
>> + return;
>
> The problem is that we don't know if we should return here or break
> here. If you don't understand the code, then it's best to just leave it
> alone.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
>> size = AFFS_SB(sb)->s_hashsize;
>> if (size > blkcnt - blk)
>> size = blkcnt - blk;
>> --
>> 1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists