linux-kernel - Re: 3.15: kernel BUG at kernel/auditsc.c:1525!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53A470E1.6090004@gmx.de>
Date:	Fri, 20 Jun 2014 19:35:29 +0200
From:	Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@....de>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3.15: kernel BUG at kernel/auditsc.c:1525!

On 06/20/2014 05:41 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 2:48 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>> On 06/16/2014 02:35 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>>
>>> To hpa, etc:  It appears that entry_32.S is missing any call to the
>>> audit exit hook on the badsys path.  If I'm diagnosing this bug report
>>> correctly, this causes OOPSes.
>>>
>>> The the world at large: it's increasingly apparent that no one (except
>>> maybe the blackhats) has ever scrutinized the syscall auditing code.
>>> This is two old severe bugs in the code that have probably been there
>>> for a long time.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, the audit code is a total mess.
>>
>>> The bad syscall nr paths are their own incomprehensible route
>>> through the entry control flow.  Rearrange them to work just like
>>> syscalls that return -ENOSYS.
>>
>> I have to admit... it sort of lends itself to a solution like this:
>>
>>         /* For the 64-bit case, analogous code for 32 bits */
>>         movl $__NR_syscall_max+1,%ecx   # *Not* __NR_syscall_max
>>         cmpq %rcx,%rax
>>         cmovae %rcx,%rax
>>         movq %r10,%rcx
>>         call *sys_call_table(,%rax,8)
>>
>> ... and having an extra (invalid) system call slot in the syscall table
>> beyond the end instead of branching off separately.
>>
>> (Note: we could use either cmova or cmovae, and either the 32- or 64-bit
>> form... the reason why is left as an exercise to the reader.)
> 
> This is CVE-2014-4508, and it's probably worth fixing.
> 
> Is my patch good?  I can resent and cc stable if needed.
> 
> --Andy
> 
I'm running my system since the time you sent it to me w/o any problems with that patch on top of 3.15.1 :



tfoerste@n22 ~/devel/linux $ cat ~/devel/priv/0001-x86_32-entry-Fix-badsys-paths.patch 

>From 8b43bd2118d876cb3163e8f7d9cd8253da649335 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <8b43bd2118d876cb3163e8f7d9cd8253da649335.1402954406.git.luto@...capital.net>
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 14:28:19 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] x86_32,entry: Fix badsys paths
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

The bad syscall nr paths are their own incomprehensible route
through the entry control flow.  Rearrange them to work just like
syscalls that return -ENOSYS.

This should fix an OOPS in the audit code when auditing is enabled
and bad syscall nrs are used.

Reported-by: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@....de>
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
---




-- 
Toralf

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/