linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Makefile: version.h macros KERNEL_EXTRAVERSION, LINUX_EXTRAVERSION

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53A49ABB.8070704@suse.cz>
Date:	Fri, 20 Jun 2014 22:34:03 +0200
From:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
To:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
CC:	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Makefile: version.h macros KERNEL_EXTRAVERSION, LINUX_EXTRAVERSION_CODE

Dne 20.6.2014 17:47, Kamal Mostafa napsal(a):
> On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 11:39 +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
>> Why don't you guys simply increment the third digit in the extended
>> stable tree and get support for KERNEL_VERSION() for free? You always
>> start after the respective stable branch has reached EOL, don't you?
> 
> Yes, we only start after the stable branch has reached EOL.
> 
> We don't increment the third integer for the extended-stable branches
> (we add a fourth integer instead) in order to avoid the possibility of a
> collision if Greg KH were to ever release a "special" post-EOL version
> of one of his branches.

The maintainers of 2.6.32.y, 3.2.y and 3.12.y have taken that risk and
it has been working fine so far ;-).

Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/