linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 Jun 2014 14:50:09 +0900
From:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree

On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 03:27:15PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> In file included from /scratch/sfr/next/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c:29:0:
> /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/cma.h:8:28: error: 'CONFIG_CMA_AREAS' undeclared here (not in a function)
>  #define MAX_CMA_AREAS (1 + CONFIG_CMA_AREAS)
>                             ^
> /scratch/sfr/next/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c:434:54: note: in expansion of macro 'MAX_CMA_AREAS'
>  static struct dma_contig_early_reserve dma_mmu_remap[MAX_CMA_AREAS] __initdata;
>                                                       ^
> 
> Caused by commit f495d267b2e0 ("CMA: generalize CMA reserved area
> management functionality").
> 
> I have reverted that commit and these commits that depend on it
> 
> 57d551e70a38 ("mm, CMA: clean-up log message")
> d75ab106aef5 ("mm, CMA: change cma_declare_contiguous() to obey coding convention")
> f693a5424631 ("mm, CMA: clean-up CMA allocation error path")
> e58e263e5254 ("PPC, KVM, CMA: use general CMA reserved area management framework")
> 

Hello,

If below patch fixes above problem, is it possible to retain above patches
in linux-next?

Thanks.

---------8<----------------
>From e5c519c4b74914067e43cb55e232f19de9967324 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 13:30:56 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] CMA: fix ARM build failure related to MAX_CMA_AREAS
 definition

If CMA is disabled, CONFIG_CMA_AREAS isn't defined so compile error
happens. To fix it, define MAX_CMA_AREAS if CONFIG_CMA_AREAS
isn't defined.

Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>

diff --git a/include/linux/cma.h b/include/linux/cma.h
index 32cab7a..371b930 100644
--- a/include/linux/cma.h
+++ b/include/linux/cma.h
@@ -5,8 +5,14 @@
  * There is always at least global CMA area and a few optional
  * areas configured in kernel .config.
  */
+#ifdef CONFIG_CMA_AREAS
 #define MAX_CMA_AREAS	(1 + CONFIG_CMA_AREAS)
 
+#else
+#define MAX_CMA_AREAS	(0)
+
+#endif
+
 struct cma;
 
 extern phys_addr_t cma_get_base(struct cma *cma);
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/