[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1403352353.23472.67.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 13:05:53 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>
Cc: greg@...ah.com, kamal.mostafa@...onical.com,
luis.henriques@...onical.com, jslaby@...e.cz, clm@...com,
jbacik@...com, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v3.10.y][v3.11.y][v3.12.y][v3.13.y][v3.14.y][PATCH 1/1][V2]
ALSA: usb-audio: Prevent printk ratelimiting from spamming kernel log while
DEBUG not defined
On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 14:21 -0400, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
[...]
> I looked at this some more. It seems like my v2 backport may be the
> most suitable for the releases mentioned in the subject line, but I'd
> like to get additional feedback.
>
> The lines added by commit a5065eb just get removed by commit b7a77235.
> Also, if I apply commit a5065eb, it will also require a backport to pull
> in just a piece of code(Remove snd_printk() and add dev_dbg()) from
> another prior commit(0ba41d9). No backport would be needed at all if I
> cherry-pick 0ba41d9, but that commit seems to have too may changes for a
> stable release.
Keep the changes squashed together if you like, but do include both
commit hashes and commit messages.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Who are all these weirdos? - David Bowie, reading IRC for the first time
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (812 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists