[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53A57848.8010203@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 20:19:20 +0800
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] include/trace/syscall.h: Use HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
instead of TRACEPOINTS
On 06/21/2014 11:43 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 10:32:37 +0800
> Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/include/trace/syscall.h b/include/trace/syscall.h
>> index 291c282..a709cbd 100644
>> --- a/include/trace/syscall.h
>> +++ b/include/trace/syscall.h
>> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ struct syscall_metadata {
>> struct ftrace_event_call *exit_event;
>> };
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
>> static inline void syscall_tracepoint_update(struct task_struct *p)
>> {
>> if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT))
>
> This has already been fixed and is in my for-next branch getting ready
> to be pushed.
>
OK, thank you for replying in time.
Thanks.
--
Open share and attitude like air warter and life which God blessed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists