[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140621060625.GG4615@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 23:06:25 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, cl@...two.org, umgwanakikbuti@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu] Reduce overhead of cond_resched() checks
for RCU
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 09:29:58PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 07:59:58PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Commit ac1bea85781e (Make cond_resched() report RCU quiescent states)
> > fixed a problem where a CPU looping in the kernel with but one runnable
> > task would give RCU CPU stall warnings, even if the in-kernel loop
> > contained cond_resched() calls. Unfortunately, in so doing, it introduced
> > performance regressions in Anton Blanchard's will-it-scale "open1" test.
> > The problem appears to be not so much the increased cond_resched() path
> > length as an increase in the rate at which grace periods complete, which
> > increased per-update grace-period overhead.
> >
> > This commit takes a different approach to fixing this bug, mainly by
> > moving the RCU-visible quiescent state from cond_resched() to
> > rcu_note_context_switch(), and by further reducing the check to a
> > simple non-zero test of a single per-CPU variable. However, this
> > approach requires that the force-quiescent-state processing send
> > resched IPIs to the offending CPUs. These will be sent only once
> > the grace period has reached an age specified by the boot/sysfs
> > parameter rcutree.jiffies_till_sched_qs, or once the grace period
> > reaches an age halfway to the point at which RCU CPU stall warnings
> > will be emitted, whichever comes first.
> >
> > Reported-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
> > Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>
> > Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
> > Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
>
> I like this approach *far* better. This is the kind of thing I had in
> mind when I suggested using the fqs machinery: remove the poll entirely
> and just thwack a CPU if it takes too long without a quiescent state.
> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Glad you like it. Not a fan of the IPI myself, but then again if you
are spending that must time looping in the kernel, an extra IPI is the
least of your problems.
I will be testing this more thoroughly, and if nothing bad happens will
send it on up within a few days.
Thanx, Paul
> > ---
> >
> > b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 6 +
> > b/include/linux/rcupdate.h | 36 --------
> > b/kernel/rcu/tree.c | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > b/kernel/rcu/tree.h | 6 +
> > b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 2
> > b/kernel/rcu/update.c | 18 ----
> > b/kernel/sched/core.c | 7 -
> > 7 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> > index 6eaa9cdb7094..910c3829f81d 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> > @@ -2785,6 +2785,12 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes can also be entirely omitted.
> > leaf rcu_node structure. Useful for very large
> > systems.
> >
> > + rcutree.jiffies_till_sched_qs= [KNL]
> > + Set required age in jiffies for a
> > + given grace period before RCU starts
> > + soliciting quiescent-state help from
> > + rcu_note_context_switch().
> > +
> > rcutree.jiffies_till_first_fqs= [KNL]
> > Set delay from grace-period initialization to
> > first attempt to force quiescent states.
> > diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > index 5a75d19aa661..243aa4656cb7 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > @@ -44,7 +44,6 @@
> > #include <linux/debugobjects.h>
> > #include <linux/bug.h>
> > #include <linux/compiler.h>
> > -#include <linux/percpu.h>
> > #include <asm/barrier.h>
> >
> > extern int rcu_expedited; /* for sysctl */
> > @@ -300,41 +299,6 @@ bool __rcu_is_watching(void);
> > #endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC) || defined(CONFIG_RCU_TRACE) || defined(CONFIG_SMP) */
> >
> > /*
> > - * Hooks for cond_resched() and friends to avoid RCU CPU stall warnings.
> > - */
> > -
> > -#define RCU_COND_RESCHED_LIM 256 /* ms vs. 100s of ms. */
> > -DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, rcu_cond_resched_count);
> > -void rcu_resched(void);
> > -
> > -/*
> > - * Is it time to report RCU quiescent states?
> > - *
> > - * Note unsynchronized access to rcu_cond_resched_count. Yes, we might
> > - * increment some random CPU's count, and possibly also load the result from
> > - * yet another CPU's count. We might even clobber some other CPU's attempt
> > - * to zero its counter. This is all OK because the goal is not precision,
> > - * but rather reasonable amortization of rcu_note_context_switch() overhead
> > - * and extremely high probability of avoiding RCU CPU stall warnings.
> > - * Note that this function has to be preempted in just the wrong place,
> > - * many thousands of times in a row, for anything bad to happen.
> > - */
> > -static inline bool rcu_should_resched(void)
> > -{
> > - return raw_cpu_inc_return(rcu_cond_resched_count) >=
> > - RCU_COND_RESCHED_LIM;
> > -}
> > -
> > -/*
> > - * Report quiscent states to RCU if it is time to do so.
> > - */
> > -static inline void rcu_cond_resched(void)
> > -{
> > - if (unlikely(rcu_should_resched()))
> > - rcu_resched();
> > -}
> > -
> > -/*
> > * Infrastructure to implement the synchronize_() primitives in
> > * TREE_RCU and rcu_barrier_() primitives in TINY_RCU.
> > */
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > index f1ba77363fbb..7d711f9a2e86 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > @@ -206,6 +206,70 @@ void rcu_bh_qs(int cpu)
> > rdp->passed_quiesce = 1;
> > }
> >
> > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, rcu_sched_qs_mask);
> > +
> > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_dynticks, rcu_dynticks) = {
> > + .dynticks_nesting = DYNTICK_TASK_EXIT_IDLE,
> > + .dynticks = ATOMIC_INIT(1),
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE
> > + .dynticks_idle_nesting = DYNTICK_TASK_NEST_VALUE,
> > + .dynticks_idle = ATOMIC_INIT(1),
> > +#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE */
> > +};
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Let the RCU core know that this CPU has gone through the scheduler,
> > + * which is a quiescent state. This is called when the need for a
> > + * quiescent state is urgent, so we burn an atomic operation and full
> > + * memory barriers to let the RCU core know about it, regardless of what
> > + * this CPU might (or might not) do in the near future.
> > + *
> > + * We inform the RCU core by emulating a zero-duration dyntick-idle
> > + * period, which we in turn do by incrementing the ->dynticks counter
> > + * by two.
> > + */
> > +void rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle(void)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + struct rcu_data *rdp;
> > + struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp;
> > + int resched_mask;
> > + struct rcu_state *rsp;
> > +
> > + local_irq_save(flags);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Yes, we can lose flag-setting operations. This is OK, because
> > + * the flag will be set again after some delay.
> > + */
> > + resched_mask = raw_cpu_read(rcu_sched_qs_mask);
> > + raw_cpu_write(rcu_sched_qs_mask, 0);
> > +
> > + /* Find the flavor that needs a quiescent state. */
> > + for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp) {
> > + rdp = raw_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
> > + if (!(resched_mask & rsp->flavor_mask))
> > + continue;
> > + smp_mb(); /* ->flavor_mask before ->cond_resched_completed. */
> > + if (ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->mynode->completed) !=
> > + ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->cond_resched_completed))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Pretend to be momentarily idle for the quiescent state.
> > + * This allows the grace-period kthread to record the
> > + * quiescent state, with no need for this CPU to do anything
> > + * further.
> > + */
> > + rdtp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_dynticks);
> > + smp_mb__before_atomic(); /* Earlier stuff before QS. */
> > + atomic_add(2, &rdtp->dynticks); /* QS. */
> > + smp_mb__after_atomic(); /* Later stuff after QS. */
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + local_irq_restore(flags);
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Note a context switch. This is a quiescent state for RCU-sched,
> > * and requires special handling for preemptible RCU.
> > @@ -216,19 +280,12 @@ void rcu_note_context_switch(int cpu)
> > trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("Start context switch"));
> > rcu_sched_qs(cpu);
> > rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(cpu);
> > + if (unlikely(raw_cpu_read(rcu_sched_qs_mask)))
> > + rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle();
> > trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("End context switch"));
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_note_context_switch);
> >
> > -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_dynticks, rcu_dynticks) = {
> > - .dynticks_nesting = DYNTICK_TASK_EXIT_IDLE,
> > - .dynticks = ATOMIC_INIT(1),
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE
> > - .dynticks_idle_nesting = DYNTICK_TASK_NEST_VALUE,
> > - .dynticks_idle = ATOMIC_INIT(1),
> > -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE */
> > -};
> > -
> > static long blimit = 10; /* Maximum callbacks per rcu_do_batch. */
> > static long qhimark = 10000; /* If this many pending, ignore blimit. */
> > static long qlowmark = 100; /* Once only this many pending, use blimit. */
> > @@ -243,6 +300,13 @@ static ulong jiffies_till_next_fqs = ULONG_MAX;
> > module_param(jiffies_till_first_fqs, ulong, 0644);
> > module_param(jiffies_till_next_fqs, ulong, 0644);
> >
> > +/*
> > + * How long the grace period must be before we start recruiting
> > + * quiescent-state help from rcu_note_context_switch().
> > + */
> > +static ulong jiffies_till_sched_qs = HZ / 20;
> > +module_param(jiffies_till_sched_qs, ulong, 0644);
> > +
> > static bool rcu_start_gp_advanced(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
> > struct rcu_data *rdp);
> > static void force_qs_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp,
> > @@ -853,6 +917,7 @@ static int rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs(struct rcu_data *rdp,
> > bool *isidle, unsigned long *maxj)
> > {
> > unsigned int curr;
> > + int *rcrmp;
> > unsigned int snap;
> >
> > curr = (unsigned int)atomic_add_return(0, &rdp->dynticks->dynticks);
> > @@ -893,27 +958,43 @@ static int rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs(struct rcu_data *rdp,
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > - * There is a possibility that a CPU in adaptive-ticks state
> > - * might run in the kernel with the scheduling-clock tick disabled
> > - * for an extended time period. Invoke rcu_kick_nohz_cpu() to
> > - * force the CPU to restart the scheduling-clock tick in this
> > - * CPU is in this state.
> > - */
> > - rcu_kick_nohz_cpu(rdp->cpu);
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * Alternatively, the CPU might be running in the kernel
> > - * for an extended period of time without a quiescent state.
> > - * Attempt to force the CPU through the scheduler to gain the
> > - * needed quiescent state, but only if the grace period has gone
> > - * on for an uncommonly long time. If there are many stuck CPUs,
> > - * we will beat on the first one until it gets unstuck, then move
> > - * to the next. Only do this for the primary flavor of RCU.
> > + * A CPU running for an extended time within the kernel can
> > + * delay RCU grace periods. When the CPU is in NO_HZ_FULL mode,
> > + * even context-switching back and forth between a pair of
> > + * in-kernel CPU-bound tasks cannot advance grace periods.
> > + * So if the grace period is old enough, make the CPU pay attention.
> > + * Note that the unsynchronized assignments to the per-CPU
> > + * rcu_sched_qs_mask variable are safe. Yes, setting of
> > + * bits can be lost, but they will be set again on the next
> > + * force-quiescent-state pass. So lost bit sets do not result
> > + * in incorrect behavior, merely in a grace period lasting
> > + * a few jiffies longer than it might otherwise. Because
> > + * there are at most four threads involved, and because the
> > + * updates are only once every few jiffies, the probability of
> > + * lossage (and thus of slight grace-period extension) is
> > + * quite low.
> > + *
> > + * Note that if the jiffies_till_sched_qs boot/sysfs parameter
> > + * is set too high, we override with half of the RCU CPU stall
> > + * warning delay.
> > */
> > - if (rdp->rsp == rcu_state_p &&
> > + rcrmp = &per_cpu(rcu_sched_qs_mask, rdp->cpu);
> > + if (ULONG_CMP_GE(jiffies,
> > + rdp->rsp->gp_start + jiffies_till_sched_qs) ||
> > ULONG_CMP_GE(jiffies, rdp->rsp->jiffies_resched)) {
> > - rdp->rsp->jiffies_resched += 5;
> > - resched_cpu(rdp->cpu);
> > + if (!(ACCESS_ONCE(*rcrmp) & rdp->rsp->flavor_mask)) {
> > + ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->cond_resched_completed) =
> > + ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->mynode->completed);
> > + smp_mb(); /* ->cond_resched_completed before *rcrmp. */
> > + ACCESS_ONCE(*rcrmp) =
> > + ACCESS_ONCE(*rcrmp) + rdp->rsp->flavor_mask;
> > + resched_cpu(rdp->cpu); /* Force CPU into scheduler. */
> > + rdp->rsp->jiffies_resched += 5; /* Enable beating. */
> > + } else if (ULONG_CMP_GE(jiffies, rdp->rsp->jiffies_resched)) {
> > + /* Time to beat on that CPU again! */
> > + resched_cpu(rdp->cpu); /* Force CPU into scheduler. */
> > + rdp->rsp->jiffies_resched += 5; /* Re-enable beating. */
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > return 0;
> > @@ -3491,6 +3572,7 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp,
> > "rcu_node_fqs_1",
> > "rcu_node_fqs_2",
> > "rcu_node_fqs_3" }; /* Match MAX_RCU_LVLS */
> > + static u8 fl_mask = 0x1;
> > int cpustride = 1;
> > int i;
> > int j;
> > @@ -3509,6 +3591,8 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp,
> > for (i = 1; i < rcu_num_lvls; i++)
> > rsp->level[i] = rsp->level[i - 1] + rsp->levelcnt[i - 1];
> > rcu_init_levelspread(rsp);
> > + rsp->flavor_mask = fl_mask;
> > + fl_mask <<= 1;
> >
> > /* Initialize the elements themselves, starting from the leaves. */
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> > index bf2c1e669691..0f69a79c5b7d 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> > @@ -307,6 +307,9 @@ struct rcu_data {
> > /* 4) reasons this CPU needed to be kicked by force_quiescent_state */
> > unsigned long dynticks_fqs; /* Kicked due to dynticks idle. */
> > unsigned long offline_fqs; /* Kicked due to being offline. */
> > + unsigned long cond_resched_completed;
> > + /* Grace period that needs help */
> > + /* from cond_resched(). */
> >
> > /* 5) __rcu_pending() statistics. */
> > unsigned long n_rcu_pending; /* rcu_pending() calls since boot. */
> > @@ -392,6 +395,7 @@ struct rcu_state {
> > struct rcu_node *level[RCU_NUM_LVLS]; /* Hierarchy levels. */
> > u32 levelcnt[MAX_RCU_LVLS + 1]; /* # nodes in each level. */
> > u8 levelspread[RCU_NUM_LVLS]; /* kids/node in each level. */
> > + u8 flavor_mask; /* bit in flavor mask. */
> > struct rcu_data __percpu *rda; /* pointer of percu rcu_data. */
> > void (*call)(struct rcu_head *head, /* call_rcu() flavor. */
> > void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head));
> > @@ -563,7 +567,7 @@ static bool rcu_nocb_need_deferred_wakeup(struct rcu_data *rdp);
> > static void do_nocb_deferred_wakeup(struct rcu_data *rdp);
> > static void rcu_boot_init_nocb_percpu_data(struct rcu_data *rdp);
> > static void rcu_spawn_nocb_kthreads(struct rcu_state *rsp);
> > -static void rcu_kick_nohz_cpu(int cpu);
> > +static void __maybe_unused rcu_kick_nohz_cpu(int cpu);
> > static bool init_nocb_callback_list(struct rcu_data *rdp);
> > static void rcu_sysidle_enter(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, int irq);
> > static void rcu_sysidle_exit(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, int irq);
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> > index cbc2c45265e2..02ac0fb186b8 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> > @@ -2404,7 +2404,7 @@ static bool init_nocb_callback_list(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> > * if an adaptive-ticks CPU is failing to respond to the current grace
> > * period and has not be idle from an RCU perspective, kick it.
> > */
> > -static void rcu_kick_nohz_cpu(int cpu)
> > +static void __maybe_unused rcu_kick_nohz_cpu(int cpu)
> > {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
> > if (tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu))
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/update.c b/kernel/rcu/update.c
> > index a2aeb4df0f60..d22309cae9f5 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/update.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/update.c
> > @@ -350,21 +350,3 @@ static int __init check_cpu_stall_init(void)
> > early_initcall(check_cpu_stall_init);
> >
> > #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_STALL_COMMON */
> > -
> > -/*
> > - * Hooks for cond_resched() and friends to avoid RCU CPU stall warnings.
> > - */
> > -
> > -DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, rcu_cond_resched_count);
> > -
> > -/*
> > - * Report a set of RCU quiescent states, for use by cond_resched()
> > - * and friends. Out of line due to being called infrequently.
> > - */
> > -void rcu_resched(void)
> > -{
> > - preempt_disable();
> > - __this_cpu_write(rcu_cond_resched_count, 0);
> > - rcu_note_context_switch(smp_processor_id());
> > - preempt_enable();
> > -}
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index 3bdf01b494fe..bc1638b33449 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -4147,7 +4147,6 @@ static void __cond_resched(void)
> >
> > int __sched _cond_resched(void)
> > {
> > - rcu_cond_resched();
> > if (should_resched()) {
> > __cond_resched();
> > return 1;
> > @@ -4166,18 +4165,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(_cond_resched);
> > */
> > int __cond_resched_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
> > {
> > - bool need_rcu_resched = rcu_should_resched();
> > int resched = should_resched();
> > int ret = 0;
> >
> > lockdep_assert_held(lock);
> >
> > - if (spin_needbreak(lock) || resched || need_rcu_resched) {
> > + if (spin_needbreak(lock) || resched) {
> > spin_unlock(lock);
> > if (resched)
> > __cond_resched();
> > - else if (unlikely(need_rcu_resched))
> > - rcu_resched();
> > else
> > cpu_relax();
> > ret = 1;
> > @@ -4191,7 +4187,6 @@ int __sched __cond_resched_softirq(void)
> > {
> > BUG_ON(!in_softirq());
> >
> > - rcu_cond_resched(); /* BH disabled OK, just recording QSes. */
> > if (should_resched()) {
> > local_bh_enable();
> > __cond_resched();
> >
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists