[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140623064625.GC19860@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 08:46:25 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, pjt@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix potential near-infinite
distribute_cfs_runtime loop
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 03:21:20PM -0700, Ben Segall wrote:
> distribute_cfs_runtime intentionally only hands out enough runtime to
> bring each cfs_rq to 1 ns of runtime, expecting the cfs_rqs to then take
> the runtime they need only once they actually get to run. However, if
> they get to run sufficiently quickly, the period timer is still in
> distribute_cfs_runtime and no runtime is available, causing them to
> throttle. Then distribute has to handle them again, and this can go on
> until distribute has handed out all of the runtime 1ns at a time, which
> takes far too long.
>
> Instead allow access to the same runtime that distribute is handing out,
> accepting that corner cases with very low quota may be able to spend the
> entire cfs_b->runtime during distribute_cfs_runtime, meaning that the
> runtime directly handed out by distribute_cfs_runtime was over quota. In
> addition, if a cfs_rq does manage to throttle like this, make sure the
> existing distribute_cfs_runtime no longer loops over it again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
Thanks Ben!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists