linux-kernel - Re: [patch 2/4] mm: vmscan: rework compaction-ready signaling in direct reclaim

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140623072850.GA9743@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:	Mon, 23 Jun 2014 09:28:50 +0200
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] mm: vmscan: rework compaction-ready signaling in
 direct reclaim

On Fri 20-06-14 16:24:49, Johannes Weiner wrote:
[...]
> From cd48b73fdca9e23aa21f65e9af1f850dbac5ab8e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 12:53:59 -0400
> Subject: [patch] mm: vmscan: rework compaction-ready signaling in direct
>  reclaim
> 
> Page reclaim for a higher-order page runs until compaction is ready,
> then aborts and signals this situation through the return value of
> shrink_zones().  This is an oddly specific signal to encode in the
> return value of shrink_zones(), though, and can be quite confusing.
> 
> Introduce sc->compaction_ready and signal the compactability of the
> zones out-of-band to free up the return value of shrink_zones() for
> actual zone reclaimability.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>

Very nice. It will help me to get rid off additional hacks for the
min_limit for memcg. Thanks!

One question below

[...]
> @@ -2500,12 +2492,15 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
>  		vmpressure_prio(sc->gfp_mask, sc->target_mem_cgroup,
>  				sc->priority);
>  		sc->nr_scanned = 0;
> -		aborted_reclaim = shrink_zones(zonelist, sc);
> +		shrink_zones(zonelist, sc);
>  
>  		total_scanned += sc->nr_scanned;
>  		if (sc->nr_reclaimed >= sc->nr_to_reclaim)
>  			goto out;
>  
> +		if (sc->compaction_ready)
> +			goto out;
> +
>  		/*
>  		 * If we're getting trouble reclaiming, start doing
>  		 * writepage even in laptop mode.
> @@ -2526,7 +2521,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
>  						WB_REASON_TRY_TO_FREE_PAGES);
>  			sc->may_writepage = 1;
>  		}
> -	} while (--sc->priority >= 0 && !aborted_reclaim);
> +	} while (--sc->priority >= 0);
>  
>  out:
>  	delayacct_freepages_end();

It is not entirely clear to me why we do not need to check and wake up
flusher threads anymore?

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/