linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.12 012/111] mm/compaction: make isolate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4ce1386883095638c80190a37677b978e9650365.1403512280.git.jslaby@suse.cz>
Date:	Mon, 23 Jun 2014 10:30:47 +0200
From:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Dongjun Shin <d.j.shin@...sung.com>,
	Sunghwan Yun <sunghwan.yun@...sung.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 012/111] mm/compaction: make isolate_freepages start at pageblock boundary

From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

commit 49e068f0b73dd042c186ffa9b420a9943e90389a upstream.

The compaction freepage scanner implementation in isolate_freepages()
starts by taking the current cc->free_pfn value as the first pfn.  In a
for loop, it scans from this first pfn to the end of the pageblock, and
then subtracts pageblock_nr_pages from the first pfn to obtain the first
pfn for the next for loop iteration.

This means that when cc->free_pfn starts at offset X rather than being
aligned on pageblock boundary, the scanner will start at offset X in all
scanned pageblock, ignoring potentially many free pages.  Currently this
can happen when

 a) zone's end pfn is not pageblock aligned, or

 b) through zone->compact_cached_free_pfn with CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE
    enabled and a hole spanning the beginning of a pageblock

This patch fixes the problem by aligning the initial pfn in
isolate_freepages() to pageblock boundary.  This also permits replacing
the end-of-pageblock alignment within the for loop with a simple
pageblock_nr_pages increment.

Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Reported-by: Heesub Shin <heesub.shin@...sung.com>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Acked-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Dongjun Shin <d.j.shin@...sung.com>
Cc: Sunghwan Yun <sunghwan.yun@...sung.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
 mm/compaction.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index 2b01acee43cd..6441083e76d3 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -657,16 +657,20 @@ static void isolate_freepages(struct zone *zone,
 				struct compact_control *cc)
 {
 	struct page *page;
-	unsigned long high_pfn, low_pfn, pfn, z_end_pfn, end_pfn;
+	unsigned long high_pfn, low_pfn, pfn, z_end_pfn;
 	int nr_freepages = cc->nr_freepages;
 	struct list_head *freelist = &cc->freepages;
 
 	/*
 	 * Initialise the free scanner. The starting point is where we last
-	 * scanned from (or the end of the zone if starting). The low point
-	 * is the end of the pageblock the migration scanner is using.
+	 * successfully isolated from, zone-cached value, or the end of the
+	 * zone when isolating for the first time. We need this aligned to
+	 * the pageblock boundary, because we do pfn -= pageblock_nr_pages
+	 * in the for loop.
+	 * The low boundary is the end of the pageblock the migration scanner
+	 * is using.
 	 */
-	pfn = cc->free_pfn;
+	pfn = cc->free_pfn & ~(pageblock_nr_pages-1);
 	low_pfn = ALIGN(cc->migrate_pfn + 1, pageblock_nr_pages);
 
 	/*
@@ -686,6 +690,7 @@ static void isolate_freepages(struct zone *zone,
 	for (; pfn >= low_pfn && cc->nr_migratepages > nr_freepages;
 					pfn -= pageblock_nr_pages) {
 		unsigned long isolated;
+		unsigned long end_pfn;
 
 		/*
 		 * This can iterate a massively long zone without finding any
@@ -720,13 +725,10 @@ static void isolate_freepages(struct zone *zone,
 		isolated = 0;
 
 		/*
-		 * As pfn may not start aligned, pfn+pageblock_nr_page
-		 * may cross a MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES boundary and miss
-		 * a pfn_valid check. Ensure isolate_freepages_block()
-		 * only scans within a pageblock
+		 * Take care when isolating in last pageblock of a zone which
+		 * ends in the middle of a pageblock.
 		 */
-		end_pfn = ALIGN(pfn + 1, pageblock_nr_pages);
-		end_pfn = min(end_pfn, z_end_pfn);
+		end_pfn = min(pfn + pageblock_nr_pages, z_end_pfn);
 		isolated = isolate_freepages_block(cc, pfn, end_pfn,
 						   freelist, false);
 		nr_freepages += isolated;
-- 
2.0.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/