linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched/fair: Disable runtime

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:07:24 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	tkhai@...dex.ru, Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
	Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched/fair: Disable runtime_enabled on dying rq

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 05:24:10PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> @@ -3790,6 +3803,12 @@ static void __maybe_unused unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs(struct rq *rq)
>  		cfs_rq->runtime_remaining = 1;
>  		if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
>  			unthrottle_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Offline rq is schedulable till cpu is completely disabled
> +		 * in take_cpu_down(), so we prevent new cfs throttling here.
> +		 */
> +		cfs_rq->runtime_enabled = 0;

Does it make sense to clear this before calling unthrottle_cfs_rq()?
Just to make sure they're in the right order..

>  	}
>  }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/