linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] perf trace pagefaults

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Jun 2014 15:41:39 +0400
From:	Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...dex-team.ru>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, paulus@...ba.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, dsahern@...il.com,
	jolsa@...hat.com, xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
	namhyung@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] perf trace pagefaults

> > But we then need to predefine many probes for decoding to work in the form of
> > func:offset, and then play catch-up with all the kernel changes.
> > Or I miss something important here?
> 
> No you don't.
> 
> If we want to disturb the system in the least way possible, we need to
> tag along the copying from userspace of those pointers, so that we get
> them fresh and just stash it in our ring buffer and get out of the way
> quickly.
I just thought maybe you have some grand plan in mind about automagically
adding probes so argument tracing works transparently. I like the
approach though.

> Almost a year ago, and it still works, now lets see the cset you mention...
> 
> [acme@zoo linux]$ git describe c4ad8f98bef77c7356aa6a9ad9188a6acc6b849d
> v3.14-rc1-14-gc4ad8f98bef7
> [acme@zoo linux]$
> [root@zoo ~]# uname -r
> 3.15.0-rc8+
> 
> Humm, what is the problem?
I thought that result->name was actually set on 65th line of
getname_flags, so the above commit would move it to 66th. But it's not
the case, sorry for confusion.

> [1] And I feel like all of tools/perf/ is just that, reference implementations, but hopefully
>     done in a such a way that may well be useful as-is :-)
I'd like perf to be a goto tool for all kind of performance analysis,
not just a reference implementation. I believe nobody looks at this
reference, and we end up with tools like https://github.com/draios/sysdig
which do their own events, ring buffer, etc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/