linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.11 45/93] leds: leds-pwm: properly clean up after probe failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1403528592-2163-46-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Jun 2014 14:02:24 +0100
From:	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
	Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.11 45/93] leds: leds-pwm: properly clean up after probe failure

3.11.10.12 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>

commit 392369019eb96e914234ea21eda806cb51a1073e upstream.

When probing with DT, we add each LED one at a time.  If we find a LED
without a PWM device (because it is not available yet) we fail the
initialisation, unregister previous LEDs, and then by way of managed
resources, we free the structure.

The problem with this is we may have a scheduled and active work_struct
in this structure, and this results in a nasty kernel oops.

We need to cancel this work_struct properly upon cleanup - and the
cleanup we require is the same cleanup as we do when the LED platform
device is removed.  Rather than writing this same code three times,
move it into a separate function and use it in all three places.

Fixes: c971ff185f64 ("leds: leds-pwm: Defer led_pwm_set() if PWM can sleep")
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>
[ luis: backported to 3.11: adjusted context ]
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
 drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c b/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c
index faf52c005e8c..5d64b2431415 100644
--- a/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c
@@ -82,6 +82,15 @@ static inline size_t sizeof_pwm_leds_priv(int num_leds)
 		      (sizeof(struct led_pwm_data) * num_leds);
 }
 
+static void led_pwm_cleanup(struct led_pwm_priv *priv)
+{
+	while (priv->num_leds--) {
+		led_classdev_unregister(&priv->leds[priv->num_leds].cdev);
+		if (priv->leds[priv->num_leds].can_sleep)
+			cancel_work_sync(&priv->leds[priv->num_leds].work);
+	}
+}
+
 static struct led_pwm_priv *led_pwm_create_of(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
@@ -139,8 +148,7 @@ static struct led_pwm_priv *led_pwm_create_of(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	return priv;
 err:
-	while (priv->num_leds--)
-		led_classdev_unregister(&priv->leds[priv->num_leds].cdev);
+	led_pwm_cleanup(priv);
 
 	return NULL;
 }
@@ -200,8 +208,8 @@ static int led_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return 0;
 
 err:
-	while (i--)
-		led_classdev_unregister(&priv->leds[i].cdev);
+	priv->num_leds = i;
+	led_pwm_cleanup(priv);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -209,13 +217,8 @@ err:
 static int led_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct led_pwm_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
-	int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < priv->num_leds; i++) {
-		led_classdev_unregister(&priv->leds[i].cdev);
-		if (priv->leds[i].can_sleep)
-			cancel_work_sync(&priv->leds[i].work);
-	}
+	led_pwm_cleanup(priv);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/