linux-kernel - Re: unparseable, undocumented /sys/class/drm/.../pstate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKb7UvjhOystpeRy1nQx49Nspve4wHQPb+e7gJQ-RT-HseK4Cw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 22 Jun 2014 22:12:14 -0400
From:	Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@...m.mit.edu>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: unparseable, undocumented /sys/class/drm/.../pstate

On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 02:22:59PM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > AFAICT, pstate file will contain something like
>> >
>> > 07: core 100 MHz memory 123 MHz *
>> > 08: core 100-200 MHz memory 123 MHz
>> >
>> > ...which does not look exactly like one-value-per-file, and I'm pretty
>> > sure userspace will get it wrong if it tries to parse it. Plus, I
>> > don't see required documentation in Documentation/ABI.
>> >
>> > Should we disable it for now, so that userspace does not start
>> > depending on it and we'll not have to maintain it forever?
>> >
>> > I guess better interface would be something like
>> >
>> > pstate/07/core_clock_min
>> >           core_clock_max
>> >           memory_clock_min
>> >           memory_clock_max
>> >
>> > and then pstate/active containing just the number of active state?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >                                                                 Pavel
>> >
>> > PS: I have no nvidia, got the news at
>> >
>> > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=nouveau_try_linux316&num=2
>>
>> FTR, this file has been in place since 3.13, and there was a different
>> file before it (performance_levels), with a comparable format since
>> much earlier (definitely 3.8, probably earlier). I think it's meant a
>> lot more for people looking at it and echo'ing stuff to it to modify
>> the levels (where supported), than for programs parsing it. Perhaps
>> sysfs is the wrong place for this -- what is the right place? debugfs?
>
> Yes, please move it to debugfs.

Could we just say that the format of this file is one-per-line of

level: information-for-the-user

And you can echo a level into it to switch to that level? That seems
like a reasonable ABI to have... would be happy to throw it into a
file somewhere... not sure where though.

  -ilia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/