[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1403541870.2526.12.camel@j-VirtualBox>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 09:44:30 -0700
From: Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Davidlohr Bueson <davidlohr@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched: Fast idling of CPU when system is partially
loaded
On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 18:22 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > So I don't get why we can't do the below; I think Jason tried to ask the
> > same...
>
> The important part for performance is to minimize the cache line transfers. Your
> unconditional variant would cause more dirty cache lines than Tim's,
> right?
How about that change to the update_sg_lb_stats() call site along with:
sgs->group_load += load;
sgs->sum_nr_running += rq->nr_running;
- if (overload && rq->nr_running > 1)
+ if (!env->sd->parent && rq->nr_running > 1)
*overload = true;
which keeps it as a conditional to avoid unnecessarily setting overload
when it's not used, and still get those benefits Peter mentioned.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists