[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53A8651B.4010607@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 10:34:19 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, cl@...two.org, umgwanakikbuti@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu] Reduce overhead of cond_resched() checks
for RCU
On 06/23/2014 10:16 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 09:55:21AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> This still has a regression. Commit 1ed70de (from Paul's git tree),
>> gets a result of 52231880. If I back up two commits to v3.16-rc1 and
>> revert ac1bea85 (the original culprit) the result goes back up to 57308512.
>>
>> So something is still going on here.
>
> And commit 1ed70de is in fact the right one, so...
>
> The rcutree.jiffies_till_sched_qs boot/sysfs parameter controls how
> long RCU waits before asking for quiescent states. The default is
> currently HZ/20. Does increasing this parameter help? Easy for me to
> increase the default if it does.
Making it an insane value:
echo 12 > /sys/module/rcutree/parameters/jiffies_till_sched_qs
average:52248706
echo 9999999 > /sys/module/rcutree/parameters/jiffies_till_sched_qs
average:55712533
gets us back up _closer_ to our original 57M number, but it's still not
quite there.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists