[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1403497988.2377.21.camel@j-VirtualBox>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 21:33:08 -0700
From: Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Davidlohr Bueson <davidlohr@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched: Fast idling of CPU when system is partially
loaded
On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 12:48 -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
> Thanks to the review from Jason and Peter. I've moved the check
> of whether load balance is required into fair.c's idle_balance.
>
> When a system is lightly loaded (i.e. no more than 1 job per cpu),
> attempt to pull job to a cpu before putting it to idle is unnecessary and
> can be skipped. This patch adds an indicator so the scheduler can know
> when there's no more than 1 active job is on any CPU in the system to
> skip needless job pulls.
> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
This change would address one of the main issues I've also been seeing
on my test machines with idle_balance where most of the
find_busiest_group overhead is not useful due to that issue with no
tasks to move.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists