[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1403549980.2970.612.camel@schen9-DESK>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:59:40 -0700
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>,
Davidlohr Bueson <davidlohr@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched: Fast idling of CPU when system is partially
loaded
On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 20:50 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 09:40:45AM -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
>
> > > @@ -5886,7 +5886,7 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(st
> > >
> > > sgs->group_load += load;
> > > sgs->sum_nr_running += rq->nr_running;
> > > - if (overload && rq->nr_running > 1)
> > > + if (rq->nr_running > 1)
> > > *overload = true;
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> > > sgs->nr_numa_running += rq->nr_numa_running;
>
> > With this change, we'll be returning the overload indicator
> > that we don't use for non-root domains, which will be
> > extra work in sg_lb_stats as it loops through each rq checking
> > the nr_running to update the indicator. I was hoping to avoid
> > that if possible.
>
> What extra work? We already load nr_running and overloaded is on-stack
> and should be quite dirty already due to that.
Okay then. I'll need to modify the v3 patch with the following bits:
- /* only need to update overload indicator for root domain */
- if (!env->sd->parent && rq->nr_running > 1)
+ if (rq->nr_running > 1)
*overload = true;
Just sent v3 patch out before your email reached me.
Tim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists