[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140623194059.GA19615@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 15:40:59 -0400
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Janne Kanniainen <janne.kanniainen@...il.com>, jkosina@...e.cz,
cooloney@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] leds: USB: HID: Add support for MSI GT683R led panels
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 09:31:34PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 02:24:32PM -0400, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 02:23:24PM -0400, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 08:16:48PM +0300, Janne Kanniainen wrote:
> > > > + ret = sysfs_create_group(&led->hdev->dev.kobj, >683r_attribute_group);
> > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > + hid_err(hdev, "failed to create sysfs attributes\n");
> > > > + goto fail;
> > > > + }
> > >
> > > No, you need to set the attribute group _before_ you call
> > > led_classdev_register, as that is where the device will be created in
> > > sysfs. Surely the other led drivers already do this? I'm almost afraid
> > > to go look...
> >
> > Yes, they do it already, set .dev_attr_group and you should be fine.
>
> But this isn't an attribute of the LEDs but rather of the parent HID
> device that is being probed (the led_mode is common to all three LEDs
> and thus belongs in the parent device, right?).
Then that's even worse :(
The sysfs attribute should be on the class device here for the LED, you
should not put an attribute on a device you are not the driver for.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists