[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53A88DE4.8050107@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 13:28:20 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
CC: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/10] x86, mpx: add MPX specific mmap interface
On 06/23/2014 01:06 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Can the new vm_operation "name" be use for this? The magic "always
> written to core dumps" feature might need to be reconsidered.
One thing I'd like to avoid is an MPX vma getting merged with a non-MPX
vma. I don't see any code to prevent two VMAs with different
vm_ops->names from getting merged. That seems like a bit of a design
oversight for ->name. Right?
Thinking out loud a bit... There are also some more complicated but more
performant cleanup mechanisms that I'd like to go after in the future.
Given a page, we might want to figure out if it is an MPX page or not.
I wonder if we'll ever collide with some other user of vm_ops->name. It
looks fairly narrowly used at the moment, but would this keep us from
putting these pages on, say, a tmpfs mount? Doesn't look that way at
the moment.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists