[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140624002050.GC27687@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 02:20:50 +0200
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, hpa@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Arun KS <arunks.linux@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/4] printk: allow increasing the ring buffer
depending on the number of CPUs
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 03:41:34PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:45:37 -0700 "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com> wrote:
>
> > ...
> >
> > If an increase is required the ring buffer is increased to
> > + the next power of 2 that can fit both the minimum kernel ring buffer
> > + (LOG_BUF_SHIFT) plus the additional worst case CPU contributions.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > + log_buf_len_update(cpu_extra + __LOG_BUF_LEN);
> > +}
>
> I'd have expected
>
> total_cpu_space = minimum-per-cpu-len * nr_possible_cpus;
> log_buf_len = max(__LOG_BUF_LEN, total_cpu_space)
>
> but here you added __LOG_BUF_LEN to total_cpu_space and I cannot work
> out why.
> .
Ah, because its cpu_extra, not total_cpu_space that is being
computed, the goal was to see how much extra junk on the
worst case a CPU might contribute. The __LOG_BUF_LEN is the
default size, so we combine both.
Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists