[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140624105940.GH14887@thunk.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 06:59:40 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Daniel Phillips <daniel@...nq.net>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Tux3 for review
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 02:10:52AM -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote:
>
> That makes sense, because the patches to transform our workarounds
> into shiny new kernel hooks are still in progress, as I said. I would
> appreciate the courtesy of being permitted to take the time to do the
> work to the necessary quality without being subjected to endless
> carping about when the patches will be posted.
The feedback which you have been getting, fairly consistently I
believe, is that it is the shiny new kernel hooks that need to be
reviewed, not the workarounds. I don't think it's a matter of people
not being willing to give you the time to do this work (take all the
time you need!); but rather that it's premature for you to be asking
for tux3 to be merged before those patches have been posted and
reviewed and found to be shiny.
Best regards,
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists