[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1406241145590.16842@knanqh.ubzr>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:46:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net, patches@...aro.org,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] arm: fiq: Allow EOI to be communicated to the
intc
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> Modern ARM systems require an EOI to be sent to the interrupt controller
> on completion of both IRQ and FIQ. The FIQ code currently does not provide
> any API to perform this. This patch provides this API, implemented by
> adding a callback to the fiq_chip structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/fiq.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/arm/kernel/fiq.c | 9 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/fiq.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/fiq.h
> index a7806ef..e5d9458 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/fiq.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/fiq.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,11 @@
> struct fiq_chip {
> void (*fiq_enable)(struct irq_data *data);
> void (*fiq_disable)(struct irq_data *data);
> +
> + /* .fiq_eoi() will be called from the FIQ handler. For this
> + * reason it must not use spin locks (or any other locks).
> + */
> + void (*fiq_eoi)(struct irq_data *data);
> };
>
> struct fiq_handler {
> @@ -43,6 +48,7 @@ extern void release_fiq(struct fiq_handler *f);
> extern void set_fiq_handler(void *start, unsigned int length);
> extern void enable_fiq(int fiq);
> extern void disable_fiq(int fiq);
> +extern void eoi_fiq(int fiq);
> extern bool has_fiq(int fiq);
> extern void fiq_register_mapping(int irq, struct fiq_chip *chip);
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/fiq.c b/arch/arm/kernel/fiq.c
> index 567f8fd..edde332 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/fiq.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/fiq.c
> @@ -183,6 +183,15 @@ void disable_fiq(int fiq)
> disable_irq(fiq + fiq_start);
> }
>
> +void eoi_fiq(int fiq)
> +{
> + struct fiq_data *data = lookup_fiq_data(fiq);
> +
> + if (data && data->fiq_chip->fiq_eoi)
> + data->fiq_chip->fiq_eoi(data->irq_data);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(eoi_fiq);
> +
> bool has_fiq(int fiq)
> {
> struct fiq_data *data = lookup_fiq_data(fiq);
> --
> 1.9.3
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists