linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 04/13] mm, compaction: move pageblock checks up from isolate_migratepages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140624165821.GC18289@nhori.bos.redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Jun 2014 12:58:21 -0400
From:	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
To:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/13] mm, compaction: move pageblock checks up from
 isolate_migratepages_range()

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 05:34:32PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 06/24/2014 06:52 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> >>-	low_pfn = isolate_migratepages_range(zone, cc, low_pfn, end_pfn, false);
> >>-	if (!low_pfn || cc->contended)
> >>-		return ISOLATE_ABORT;
> >>+		/* Do not scan within a memory hole */
> >>+		if (!pfn_valid(low_pfn))
> >>+			continue;
> >>+
> >>+		page = pfn_to_page(low_pfn);
> >
> >Can we move (page_zone != zone) check here as isolate_freepages() does?
> 
> Duplicate perhaps, not sure about move.

Sorry for my unclearness.
I meant that we had better do this check in per-pageblock loop (as the free
scanner does) instead of in per-pfn loop (as we do now.)

> Does CMA make sure that all pages
> are in the same zone?

It seems not, CMA just specifies start pfn and end pfn, so it can cover
multiple zones.
And we also have a case of node overlapping as commented in commit dc9086004
"mm: compaction: check for overlapping nodes during isolation for migration".
So we need this check in compaction side.

Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi

> Common sense tells me it would be useless otherwise,
> but I haven't checked if we can rely on it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/