[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <32647147.KmAPzBrbMT@sifl>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 14:03:08 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: the selinux tree needs cleaning up
On Friday, June 20, 2014 12:06:28 PM Paul Moore wrote:
{big snip}
> Stephen, assuming for a moment that I created a fresh branch, based against
> 3.15, and then added the SELinux patches for 3.16 (basically the few new
> patches that were in the ole #next branch) would that serve as a reasonable
> basis for a new SELinux #next branch? Around the -rc5/6/7 timeframe I would
> send a pull request to James to pull from this next branch into the Linux
> Security branch for 3.17. Once 3.16 is released, I would merge that into
> this new #next branch and continue with the next round of patches.
>
> FYI, more or less, the above is the process we've settled upon for all of
> the trees that get accumulated into the Linux Security tree.
Hi Stephen,
Does the above work for you in linux-next? I'd like to try and resolve this
sooner rather than later and I imagine you feel the same ...
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists