[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=VP4-+B6oV8Skb3rxxPRbOWmzu=6PJbWbxCU=86ZvRuYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:59:17 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...gle.com>
To: Tushar Behera <tushar.b@...sung.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ML Devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
ML Arch-Arm <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Shaik Ameer Basha <shaik.ameer@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] clk: exynos-audss: Keep the parent of mout_audss
always enabled
Tushar,
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Tushar Behera <tushar.b@...sung.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org> wrote:
>> Tushar Behera <tushar.b@...sung.com> writes:
>>
>>> When the output clock of AUDSS mux is disabled, we are getting kernel
>>> oops while doing a clk_get() on other clocks provided by AUDSS.
>>>
>>> Though user manual doesn't specify this dependency, we came across
>>> this issue while disabling the parent of AUDSS mux clocks.
>>>
>>> Keeping the parents of AUDSS mux always enabled fixes this issue.
>>
>> While this patch works (and fixes the boot problem for me), it seems
>> like it's papering over the real problem.
>>
>
> Thanks for testing.
>
>> Seems like the right fix is actually modelling the clocks properly so
>> that enabling a child clock ensures that the parent is also enabled.
>>
>
> Patch 2/3 was to ensure we have proper clock tree defined for
> Exynos5420. While testing with audio disabled, that patch alone fixed
> the issue. But when audio was enabled (and hence I2S0 was trying to
> access the clocks), we got some kernel oops during late booting, hence
> I came up this solution.
>
> The solution might be a little half-baked because of the urgency to
> push the fix, but will try to dig more into the issue on Monday when I
> resume office.
Which Monday were you referring to? ;)
...but in all seriousness do you have an official status update on
this patch? It seems as if it's not needed and all you need is
<https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4333581/>, but it would be nice to
get an official confirmation.
Thanks!
-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists