| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CA+55aFx--+YxUWX5SGet0QxfDo2PcJj3x5tcwqiCTA9yiyi_bQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 17:04:41 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT] Networking
Ping?
This is all related to the new checksumming code by Tom Herbert.
The oops seems to be "gso_make_checksum()" taking a checksum of
something that isn't mapped. Either the math for 'plen' is simply
wrong (maybe "csum_start" is not properly initialized), or maybe there
is a missing skb_pull() or similar, or the skb is fragmented and/or
needs kmapping.
It's not a NULL pointer dereference, the faulting address is
ffff8800aa1a8000, so it's some kind of invalid pointer arithmetic
found by DEBUG_PAGEALLOC.
The register information all looks reasonably sane (ie we have 11
64-byte blocks to go - so it looks like the length of the csum is
reasonable), and the starting address was clearly ok too, so this is
the copying just traversing into a page that isn't allocated. That
really smells like a skb with multiple fragments to me. Can that
happen for the GSO code?
Comparing the newly added "gso_make_checksum()" function with our
venerable "skb_checksum()", I get the feeling that there are a few
corners that have been cut.
Linus
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 07:42:54PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 07:04:50PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 07:33:12PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > >
> > > > 1) Fix checksumming regressions, from Tom Herbert.
> > >
> > > Something still not right for me here.
> > > After about 5 minutes, I get an oops and then instant reboot/lock up.
> > >
> > > I haven't managed to get a trace over usb-serial because it seems to
> > > crash before it completes. Hand transcribed one looks like..
> > >
> > > rbp: ffff880236403970 r08: 0000000000000000 r09: 0000000000000000
> > > r10: 000000000000005a r11: 00000000000002d7 f12: ffff880233000d80
> > > r13: ffff8800aa1a6fc2 r14: ffff880233001d40 f15: 00000000ffffac82
> > > fs: 0 fs: ffff880236400000 knlGS: 0
> > > CS: 10 DS: 0 ES: 0 CR0: 80050033
> > > CR2: ffff8800aa1a8000 CR3: 1a0d000 CR4: 407f0
> > > Stack:
> > > ffff880236403988 ffffffff81298bbc 00000000000016c0 ffff8802364039e8
> > > ffffffff814ca05a ffff880233001d40 000005a80000e397 ffff880233001680
> > > 0000000000000000 0d420685ffffac82 000000000000012a 000000000000004e
> > > Call Trace:
> > > <IRQ>
> > > csum_partial
> > > tcp_gso_segment
> > > inet_gso_segment
> > > ? update_dl_migration
> > > skb_mac_gso_segment
> > > __skb_gso_segment
> > > dev_hard_start_xmit
> > > sch_direct_xmit
> > > __dev_queue_xmit
> > > ? dev_hard_start_xmit
> > > dev_queue_xmit
> > > ip_finish_output
> > > ? ip_output
> > > ip_output
> > > ip_forward_finish
> > > ip_forward
> > > ip_rcv_finish
> > > ip_rcv
> > > __netif_receive_skb_core
> > > ? __netif_receive_skb_core
> > > ? trace_hardirqs_on
> > > __netif_receive_skb
> > > netif_receive_skb_internal
> > > napi_gro_complete
> > > ? napi_gro_complete
> > > dev_gro_receive
> > > ? dev_gro_receive
> > > napi_gro_receive
> > > rtl8169_poll
> > > net_rx_action
> > > __do_softirq
> > > irq_exit
> > > do_IRQ
> > > common_interrupt
> > > <EOI>
> > > cpuidle_enter_state
> > > cpuidle_enter
> > > cpu_startup_entry
> > > rest_init
> > > ? csum_partial_copy_generic
> > > start_kernel
> > > RIP: do_csum+0x83/0x180
> > >
> > > Code: 41 89 d2 74 45 89 d1 45 31 c0 48 89 fa 0f 1f 00 48 03 02 48 13 42
> > > 08 48 13 42 10 48 13 42 20 48 13 42 28 48 13 42 30 <48> 13 42 38 4c 11
> > > c0 48 83 c2 40 83 e9 01 75 d5 41 83 ea 01 49
> > >
> > > All code
> > > ========
> > > 0: 41 89 d2 mov %edx,%r10d
> > > 3: 74 45 je 0x4a
> > > 5: 89 d1 mov %edx,%ecx
> > > 7: 45 31 c0 xor %r8d,%r8d
> > > a: 48 89 fa mov %rdi,%rdx
> > > d: 0f 1f 00 nopl (%rax)
> > > 10: 48 03 02 add (%rdx),%rax
> > > 13: 48 13 42 08 adc 0x8(%rdx),%rax
> > > 17: 48 13 42 10 adc 0x10(%rdx),%rax
> > > 1b: 48 13 42 20 adc 0x20(%rdx),%rax
> > > 1f: 48 13 42 28 adc 0x28(%rdx),%rax
> > > 23: 48 13 42 30 adc 0x30(%rdx),%rax
> > > 27:* 48 13 42 38 adc 0x38(%rdx),%rax <-- trapping instruction
> > > 2b: 4c 11 c0 adc %r8,%rax
> > > 2e: 48 83 c2 40 add $0x40,%rdx
> > > 32: 83 e9 01 sub $0x1,%ecx
> > > 35: 75 d5 jne 0xc
> > > 37: 41 83 ea 01 sub $0x1,%r10d
> > > 3b: 49 rex.WB
> > >
> > > Typical, rdx and rax had scrolled off the screen.
> >
> > after removing the dump_stack invocations, I noticed that the reason
> > this is rebooting is probably because right after the initial oops
> > we hit the WARN_ON at arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:124
> >
> > if (unlikely(cpu_is_offline(cpu))) {
> > WARN_ON(1);
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > lol.
> >
> > Anwyay, before all that nonsense, I now have the top of the oops..
> >
> > BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff880218c18000
> > IP: do_csum+0x68
> > PGD: 2c6a067 PUD: 2c6d067 PMD 23fd1c067 PTE: 80000000218c18060
> > RAX: 2090539bbf7b28f2 RBX: 00000000acb23d4e RCX: 000000000000000b
> > RDX: ffff880218c18000 RSI: 0000000000001c62 RDI: ffff880218c16680
> >
> > Maybe also notable here is that the kernel is built with DEBUG_PAGEALLOC on.
>
> This is still a problem in -rc2.
> Lasts about 5 minutes, then reboots.
>
> Dave
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists