[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1406241718210.22030@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 17:26:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix CONFIG_ZONE_DMA on systems with no 32-bit
addressable DRAM
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Mark Salter wrote:
> Commit 2d5a5612bc (arm64: Limit the CMA buffer to 32-bit if ZONE_DMA)
> forces the CMA buffer to be 32-bit addressable if CONFIG_ZONE_DMA is
> defined. This breaks CMA on platforms with no 32-bit addressable DRAM.
> This patch checks to make sure there is 32-bit addressable DRAM before
> setting the 32-bit limit. If there is none, no limit is placed on the
> CMA buffer. This allows a single kernel (with CONFIG_ZONE_DMA defined)
> to support platforms requiring the 32-bit limit and platforms with no
> 32-bit limit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> index c5415e2..2925576 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> @@ -149,8 +149,17 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void)
> early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem();
>
> /* 4GB maximum for 32-bit only capable devices */
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA))
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA)) {
> dma_phys_limit = dma_to_phys(NULL, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)) + 1;
> + /*
> + * If platform doesn't have DRAM within the dma_phys_limit,
> + * remove the limit altogether. This allows one kernel (with
> + * CONFIG_ZONE_DMA defined) to support platforms with 32-bit
> + * only devices and platforms with no 32-bit DRAM.
> + */
> + if (dma_phys_limit <= memblock_start_of_DRAM())
> + dma_phys_limit = 0;
> + }
> dma_contiguous_reserve(dma_phys_limit);
>
> memblock_allow_resize();
It is a shame that we have very similar logic, all dependent on
memblock_start_of_DRAM(), in both zone_sizes_init() and
arm64_memblock_init() and the latter having to be called before the
former. I assume there's no way to make this cleaner in the bootstrap
code so the dma_to_phys(NULL, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)) + 1 limit can be handled
properly in a single location?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists