[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140625080605.GN27687@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:06:05 +0200
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
To: Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>, tiwai@...e.de,
chunkeey@...glemail.com, leedom@...lsio.com, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] p54: use request_firmware_direct() for optional
EEPROM override
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 09:26:23AM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 25-06-14 00:39, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
>>
>> The p54 driver uses request_firmware() twice, once for actual
>> firmware and then another time for an optional user overide on
>> EEPROM, 3826.eeprom. The custom EEPROM is optional but if not
>> present we'll introduce an extra lag of 60 seconds with udev
>> present. Annotate we don't want udev nonsense here to avoid
>> the lag in case its not present.
>
> I guess the fact that EEPROM is optional does not matter much. If doing a
> second request you could always use request_firmware_direct(), right?
The better way to rephrase this from a technical perspective is:
I don't care about udev firmware upload as it'll be removed, and its only
adding 60 second delays. I *know* this driver doesn't require custom paths and
wierd user upload tools so lets evolve a few light years ahead and embrace
non-udev Direct upload for at least optional juju config data.
Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists