[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4656BEB6164FC34F8171C6538F1A595B2E946EE0@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:24:36 +0000
From: "Chen, Alvin" <alvin.chen@...el.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Ong, Boon Leong" <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] USB: ehci-pci: USB host controller support for Intel
Quark X1000
See my comments below:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gregkh@...uxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 9:25 PM
> To: Chen, Alvin
> Cc: Alan Stern; linux-usb@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Ong,
> Boon Leong
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: ehci-pci: USB host controller support for Intel Quark
> X1000
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 08:51:43AM -0700, Chen, Alvin wrote:
> > From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...el.com>
> >
> > This patch is to enable USB host controller for Intel Quark X1000. Add
> > pci quirks to adjust the packet buffer in/out threshold value, and
> > ensure EHCI packet buffer i/o threshold value is reconfigured to half.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Alvin (Weike) Chen <alvin.chen@...el.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c | 4 ++++
> > drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c | 42
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.h | 2 ++
> > 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c
> > index 3e86bf4..33cfa23 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c
> > @@ -50,6 +50,10 @@ static int ehci_pci_reinit(struct ehci_hcd *ehci, struct
> pci_dev *pdev)
> > if (!retval)
> > ehci_dbg(ehci, "MWI active\n");
> >
> > + /* Reset the threshold limit */
> > + if(unlikely(usb_is_intel_qrk(pdev)))
>
> Why unlikely()? Have you measured a speed difference here? And this is a
> _very_ slow path, what does that speed difference you measured help with?
>
Actually, 'unlikely' is not necessary, I will remove it in PATCH v2.
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists