[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ionpxmyi.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 14:12:05 +0300
From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 5/7] perf: add a pmu capability for "exclusive" events
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 06:41:48PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> +static bool exclusive_event_ok(struct perf_event *event,
>> + struct perf_event_context *ctx)
>> +{
>> + struct perf_event *iter_event;
>> +
>> + if (!(event->pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUSIVE))
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(iter_event, &ctx->event_list, event_entry) {
>> + if (exclusive_event_match(iter_event, event))
>> + return false;
>> + }
>
> This list iteration needs either rcu or ctx->lock or ctx->mutex, and the
> two callsites below don't have either afaict.
True, this needs to be done before perf_install_in_context() under the
same ctx->mutex. Thanks!
Regards,
--
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists