[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1403695360.17451.32.camel@joe-AO725>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 04:22:40 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Mark literal strings in __init / __exit code
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 10:34 +0200, Mathias Krause wrote:
> On 25 June 2014 09:48, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 09:35 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> >> Speaking of dangling pointers: A similar disaster would happen if some
> >> code containing pi_* calls gets copy-pasted to some non-__init
> >> function.
> >
> > This is my biggest issue with adding these new,
> > somewhat obscure macros.
>
> modpost will handle these cases.
If so, then I don't see a problem.
> >> Could checkpatch learn to warn about calling these functions
> >> from the wrong context?
> >
> > It's not possible. checkpatch works on patch chunks.
> > Any patch chunk may not contain the function attributes.
>
> checkpatch.pl -f might detect them, though :/
Something like your awk script would be easier.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists