[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140625113310.GD21788@stfomichev-desktop.yandex.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:33:10 +0400
From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...dex-team.ru>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, paulus@...ba.org, mingo@...hat.com,
dsahern@...il.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, namhyung@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf trace: add support for pagefault tracing
> > Also, have you considered using:
> >
> > [root@zoo ~]# perf list exceptions:page_fault*
> > exceptions:page_fault_user [Tracepoint event]
> > exceptions:page_fault_kernel [Tracepoint event]
> > [root@zoo ~]#
> >
> > Instead? I need to check if they're completely equivalent to what we
> > need here...
> Hm, didn't know there are two kinds of fault events :-/
> But it seems these are x86 only.
Maybe we can use these x86 only events to trace userspace fault duration?
It seems we can pair exceptions:page_fault_user and
context_tracking:user_enter. But it's just a theory, need to verify...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists