[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqLbCeiB13ajNpVQDh_Lxgn37ixJ_jYkceps07mzz5su1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 07:50:12 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc: "kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
eric.auger@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/9] irqchip: GIC: Convert to EOImode == 1
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com> wrote:
> So far, GICv2 has been used in with EOImode == 0. The effect of this
> mode is to perform the priority drop and the deactivation of the
> interrupt at the same time.
>
> While this works perfectly for Linux (we only have a single priority),
> it causes issues when an interrupt is forwarded to a guest, and when
> we want the guest to perform the EOI itself.
>
> For this case, the GIC architecture provides EOImode == 1, where:
> - A write to the EOI register drops the priority of the interrupt and leaves
> it active. Other interrupts at the same priority level can now be taken,
> but the active interrupt cannot be taken again
> - A write to the DIR marks the interrupt as inactive, meaning it can
> now be taken again.
>
> We only enable this feature when booted in HYP mode. Also, as most device
> trees are broken (they report the CPU interface size to be 4kB, while
> the GICv2 CPU interface size is 8kB), output a warning if we're booted
> in HYP mode, and disable the feature.
Why not fix-up the size so the feature can be enabled?
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists