lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA_naeGVc+Rsec=Ds6Lzf345nzFj3Wg2RWY-6LWYv3euNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:06:33 +0100
From:	Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@...aro.org>
To:	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc:	"kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
	arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/9] irqchip: GIC: Convert to EOImode == 1

On 25 June 2014 10:28, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com> wrote:
> For this case, the GIC architecture provides EOImode == 1, where:
> - A write to the EOI register drops the priority of the interrupt and leaves
> it active. Other interrupts at the same priority level can now be taken,
> but the active interrupt cannot be taken again
> - A write to the DIR marks the interrupt as inactive, meaning it can
> now be taken again.
>
> We only enable this feature when booted in HYP mode. Also, as most device
> trees are broken (they report the CPU interface size to be 4kB, while
> the GICv2 CPU interface size is 8kB), output a warning if we're booted
> in HYP mode, and disable the feature.

Does that mean you guarantee not to write to the DEACTIVATE
register if not booted in Hyp mode? I ask because QEMU's
GIC emulation doesn't emulate that register, so it would be
useful to know if this patch means newer kernels are going to fall
over under TCG QEMU...

(The correct fix, obviously, is to actually implement the QEMU
support for split prio-drop and deactivate. Christoffer, you're our
GIC emulation expert now, right? :-) )

thanks
-- PMM
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ