linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] perf timechart io mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140625143837.GD1153@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 Jun 2014 16:38:37 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:	Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...dex-team.ru>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	paulus@...ba.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
	namhyung@...nel.org, artagnon@...il.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	bp@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] perf timechart io mode

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 08:01:17AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 6/25/14, 5:20 AM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> >>>maybe we dont need to fail in this case.. seems like it should
> >>>not be hard to detect, wanr and recover? ;-)
> >The easiest way is just to bail out and don't try to be smart, that's
> >what I do now.
> >
> >Another approach would be to just convert all my consistency
> >checks to warnings and skip invalid events (and hope it somehow works). I
> >think it makes sense when for some reason we have perf.data which
> >is not really consistent but we still want to get something out of it.
> 
> If the event type does not make sense how can you trust any other field --
> like event size?
> 
> >
> >>seems to me it should not be happening at all. It seems like the head caught
> >>the tail and was not properly detected.
> >So you mean it perf record's fault?
> >
> 
> In my cases I am running perf-record. At the end of the session it walks the
> events and in too many cases I see the message:
> 
>  0x113f80 [0x8]: failed to process type: 68
> 

hum.. 68 is PERF_RECORD_FINISHED_ROUND, so there was something wrong
during the queue flush.. thus processing all the queue events and
failing only if either the parsing or delivery fails

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/