[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140625150053.GE26883@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:00:53 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] cgroup: fix a race between cgroup_mount() and
cgroup_kill_sb()
Hey,
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 09:56:31AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> > Hmmm? Why does that matter? The only region in cgroup_mount() which
> > needs to be put inside such mutex would be root lookup, no?
>
> unfortunately that won't help. I think what you suggest is:
>
> cgroup_mount()
> {
> mutex_lock();
> lookup_cgroup_root();
> mutex_unlock();
> kernfs_mount();
> }
>
> cgroup_kill_sb()
> {
> mutex_lock();
> percpu_ref_kill();
> mutex_Unlock();
> kernfs_kill_sb();
> }
>
> See, we may still be destroying the superblock after we've succeeded
> in getting the refcnt of cgroup root.
Sure, but now the decision to kill is synchronized so the other side
can interlock with it. e.g.
cgroup_mount()
{
mutex_lock();
lookup_cgroup_root();
if (root isn't killed yet)
root->this_better_stay_alive++;
mutex_unlock();
kernfs_mount();
}
cgroup_kill_sb()
{
mutex_lock();
if (check whether root can be killed)
percpu_ref_kill();
mutex_unlock();
if (the above condition was true)
kernfs_kill_sb();
}
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists