linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] percpu-refcount, aio: use percpu_ref_cancel_init() in ioctx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140625153718.GF26883@htj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:37:18 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
Cc:	cl@...ux-foundation.org, kmo@...erainc.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] percpu-refcount, aio: use percpu_ref_cancel_init()
 in ioctx_alloc()

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:35:20AM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
> 
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:56:34AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello, Benjamin.
> ...
> > It'd probably easier if I route this through percpu tree with the rest
> > of changes as there are further changes on the aio side (trivial but
> > still), so we'd end up having to do pulling dance back and forth.  The
> > changes on aio side are mostly trivial.  Can I route them through
> > percpu tree with your acks?
> 
> Sure, no problem -- add my acks and proceed.  I don't think there should 
> be any conflicts.  Cheers,

Thanks a lot!

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/