[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140625164107.GA19569@lukather>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 18:41:07 +0200
From: "maxime.ripard" <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Emilio Lopez <emilio@...pez.com.ar>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Luc Verhaegen <libv@...net.be>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 12/20] clk: sunxi: Add A23 APB0
support to sun6i-a31-apb0-clk
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 02:13:58PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > If these two clocks are these different though, maybe it would just be
> > easier to add a new driver. These are trivial enough anyway.
>
> Yes it is. But it adds more of the same boilerplate code than actual
> differences of the hardware.
>
> I'm inclined to keep it as it is for now, unless someone strongly
> objects.
I'm not strongly objecting, but I'd strongly prefer to go with two
drivers.
I don't really want to end up in the same case than with clk-sunxi.c,
which handles a lot of weird corner case for one particular clock,
while most of them are just a single-bit gate.
Especially when they have nothing in common, which is pretty much the
case here.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists