| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:07:21 -0700 From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com> To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> Cc: jolsa@...nel.org, mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp, aswin@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Darren Hart <darren@...art.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] perf bench: futex: Support operations for shared futexes On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 14:05 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 09:43:49AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso escreveu: > > On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 13:41 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > Em Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:14:27AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso escreveu: > > > > Unlike futex-hash, requeuing and wakeup benchmarks do not support > > > > shared futexes, limiting the usefulness of the programs. Correct > > > > this, and allow using the local -S parameter. The default remains > > > > using private futexes. > > > > > > Also isn't this benchmark related to something Darren did? Just checking > > > why he isn't in the CC list, Darren, does this all sound fine to you? > > > > Darren is well aware of these benchmarks, and we've discussed the topic > > in the past. This change doesn't conflict with what he maintains in the > > futextest suite. > > Ok, thanks, just checking :-) Hi Arnaldo, curious as to why this one wasn't picked up. Thanks, Davidlohr -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists