linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: s3c2410: resume the I2C controller earlier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 25 Jun 2014 20:09:42 +0200
From:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
To:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
CC:	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@...omium.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: s3c2410: resume the I2C controller earlier

Hello Doug,

On 06/25/2014 01:56 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> From: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@...omium.org>
> 
> When the wake-up is triggered by the PMIC RTC, the RTC driver is trying
> to read the PMIC interrupt status over I2C and fails because the I2C
> controller is not resumed yet.
> Let's resume the I2C controller earlier in the _noirq phase
> (as other hardwares are doing), so we can properly get the wake-up
> condition.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Added missing freeze/thaw/poweroff/restore
> 
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c
> index e828a1d..ecb389c 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c
> @@ -1267,7 +1267,7 @@ static int s3c24xx_i2c_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int s3c24xx_i2c_resume(struct device *dev)
> +static int s3c24xx_i2c_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
>  	struct s3c24xx_i2c *i2c = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> @@ -1285,7 +1285,11 @@ static int s3c24xx_i2c_resume(struct device *dev)
>  static const struct dev_pm_ops s3c24xx_i2c_dev_pm_ops = {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>  	.suspend_noirq = s3c24xx_i2c_suspend_noirq,
> -	.resume = s3c24xx_i2c_resume,
> +	.resume_noirq = s3c24xx_i2c_resume_noirq,
> +	.freeze_noirq = s3c24xx_i2c_suspend_noirq,
> +	.thaw_noirq = s3c24xx_i2c_resume_noirq,
> +	.poweroff_noirq = s3c24xx_i2c_suspend_noirq,
> +	.restore_noirq = s3c24xx_i2c_resume_noirq,
>  #endif
>  };
>  
> 

Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>

Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/