[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140625150318.4355468ab59a5293e870605e@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:03:18 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: catch memory commitment underflow
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 00:16:14 +0400 Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com> wrote:
> This patch prints warning (if CONFIG_DEBUG_VM=y) when
> memory commitment becomes too negative.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -134,6 +134,12 @@ int __vm_enough_memory(struct mm_struct *mm, long pages, int cap_sys_admin)
> {
> unsigned long free, allowed, reserve;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> + WARN_ONCE(percpu_counter_read(&vm_committed_as) <
> + -(s64)vm_committed_as_batch * num_online_cpus(),
> + "memory commitment underflow");
> +#endif
> +
> vm_acct_memory(pages);
The changelog doesn't describe the reasons for making the change.
I assume this warning will detect the situation which the previous two
patches just fixed?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists