linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] lib: list_sort: Various minor improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87a990obdb.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date:	Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:47:12 +0200
From:	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>,
	Don Mullis <don.mullis@...il.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] lib: list_sort: Various minor improvements

Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:

> On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:28:18 +0200 Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk> wrote:
>
>> Minor comment: Won't this end up saying "list_sort_test: list passed to
>> ...", despite the list coming from a 'real' user? Maybe change the first
>> #define to '"list_sort: " fmt', the above message to "passed list too
>> long for efficiency", and redefine pr_fmt right after #ifdef
>> CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT.
>
> Yeah, I was hoping nobody would notice that ;)
>
> How about just
>
> 		printk_once(KERN_DEBUG "list too long for efficiency\n");

FWIW, fine by me.

Rasmus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/