linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: define and export __clk_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAObsKDVrXRgO1e2=SorGiNUMhGPCCUUPtsjDfnST9gFN4=qTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:37:40 +0200
From:	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
To:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: define and export __clk_get_debug for providers

On 25 June 2014 20:23, Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Peter,
>
> Just FYI, I'm trying to reverse the trend of prepending double
> underscores for functions that are used by clock providers. That stuff
> started out small and sort of grew out of control ;-)

I'm looking at rebasing Rabin's patches for per-user clks, and I have
had to add a few variants for providers, so they can be called with
clk_core instead. Have been prepending underscores for those internal
variants, but in some cases I had to also append a _internal suffix
because there were already variants without locking.

What convention were you thinking of for distinguishing provider-only
variants for e.g. clk_set_rate?

Regards,

Tomeu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/