| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-id: <1403777337.27156.19.camel@AMDC1943>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:08:57 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@...labora.co.uk>,
Daniel Stone <daniels@...labora.com>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/14] regulator: Add driver for Maxim 77802 PMIC
regulators
On śro, 2014-06-25 at 21:03 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The MAX77802 PMIC has 10 high-efficiency Buck and 32 Low-dropout
> (LDO) regulators. This patch adds support for all these regulators
> found on the MAX77802 PMIC and is based on a driver added by Simon
> Glass to the Chrome OS kernel 3.8 tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
> ---
>
> Changes since v3:
> - Set the supply_name for regulators to lookup their parent supply node.
> Suggested by Mark Brown.
> - Change Exyno5 for Exynos5420/Exynos5800 in regulator driver Kconfig.
> Suggested by Doug Anderson.
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Use dev_warn() instead pr_warn(). Suggested by Mark Brown.
> - Add a generic function to regmap core to copy registers instead of
> having a driver-specific function. Suggested by Mark Brown.
> - Remove unnecessary probe debug log. Suggested by Mark Brown.
> - Set struct regulator_config dev field to MFD instead of the platform dev.
> Suggested by Mark Brown.
> - Read the regulators operational mode from the hardware registers instead
> of setting to normal as default on probe. Suggested by Mark Brown.
> - Remove unnecessary cross-subsystem dependencies. Suggested by Lee Jones.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Remove unneeded check if num_regulators != MAX77802_MAX_REGULATORS.
> - Fix .set_suspend_mode handler comment and split regulators ops for
> regulators that behave differently. Suggested by Mark Brown.
> - Use module_platform_driver() instead of having init/exit functions.
> Suggested by Mark Brown.
> - Use the new descriptor-based GPIO interface instead of the deprecated
> integer based GPIO one. Suggested by Mark Brown.
> - Look for "regulators" child node instead of "voltage-regulators" to be
> consistent with other PMIC drivers. Suggested by Mark Brown.
(...)
> +
> +static struct regulator_desc regulators[] = {
> + regulator_77802_desc_16_buck(1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_234_buck(2),
> + regulator_77802_desc_234_buck(3),
> + regulator_77802_desc_234_buck(4),
> + regulator_77802_desc_buck5(5),
> + regulator_77802_desc_16_buck(6),
> + regulator_77802_desc_buck7_10(7),
> + regulator_77802_desc_buck7_10(8),
> + regulator_77802_desc_buck7_10(9),
> + regulator_77802_desc_buck7_10(10),
> + regulator_77802_desc_n_ldo(1, 10, 2),
> + regulator_77802_desc_n_ldo(2, 10, 1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(3, 3, 2),
> + regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(4, 6, 1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(5, 3, 1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(6, 3, 1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(7, 3, 1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_n_ldo(8, 1, 1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(9, 5, 1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(10, 4, 1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(11, 4, 1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(12, 9, 1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(13, 4, 1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(14, 4, 1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_n_ldo(15, 1, 1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_n_ldo(17, 2, 1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(18, 7, 1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(19, 5, 1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(20, 7, 2),
> + regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(21, 6, 2),
> + regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(23, 9, 1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(24, 6, 1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(25, 9, 1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(26, 9, 1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_n_ldo(27, 2, 1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(28, 7, 1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(29, 7, 1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_n_ldo(30, 2, 1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(32, 9, 1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(33, 6, 1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(34, 9, 1),
> + regulator_77802_desc_n_ldo(35, 2, 1),
> +};
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static int max77802_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + struct max77802_platform_data *pdata)
> +{
> + struct max77802_dev *iodev = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
> + struct device_node *pmic_np, *regulators_np;
> + struct max77802_regulator_data *rdata;
> + struct of_regulator_match rmatch;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + pmic_np = iodev->dev->of_node;
> + regulators_np = of_get_child_by_name(pmic_np, "regulators");
> + if (!regulators_np) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not find regulators sub-node\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + pdata->num_regulators = ARRAY_SIZE(regulators);
> + rdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*rdata) *
> + pdata->num_regulators, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!rdata) {
> + of_node_put(regulators_np);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < pdata->num_regulators; i++) {
> + rmatch.name = regulators[i].name;
> + rmatch.init_data = NULL;
> + rmatch.of_node = NULL;
> + if (of_regulator_match(&pdev->dev, regulators_np, &rmatch,
> + 1) != 1) {
> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "No matching regulator for '%s'\n",
> + rmatch.name);
> + continue;
> + }
> + rdata[i].initdata = rmatch.init_data;
> + rdata[i].of_node = rmatch.of_node;
> + rdata[i].id = regulators[i].id;
> + }
I think instead of matching one by one you can alternatively match
everything at once:
static struct of_regulator_match regulator_matches[] = {
{ .name = "LDO1", },
....
};
if (of_regulator_match(&pdev->dev, regulators_np, regulator_matches,
ARRAY_SIZE(regulator_matches)) {
The code would be smaller although you would have to create an array
with names of regulators. I'll leave it up to you since I don't have
preference for it.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists