linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 07/14] mfd: Add driver for Maxim 77802 Power Management IC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53AC47E3.2030306@collabora.co.uk>
Date:	Thu, 26 Jun 2014 18:18:43 +0200
From:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
To:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
CC:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@...labora.co.uk>,
	Daniel Stone <daniels@...labora.com>,
	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/14] mfd: Add driver for Maxim 77802 Power Management
 IC

Hello Doug,

On 06/26/2014 06:12 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Javier,
> 
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
> <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> +
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>>>> +static int max77802_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    struct i2c_client *i2c = container_of(dev, struct i2c_client, dev);
>>>> +    struct max77802_dev *max77802 = i2c_get_clientdata(i2c);
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
>>>> +            enable_irq_wake(max77802->irq);
>>>> +
>>>> +    disable_irq(max77802->irq);
>>>
>>> Can you add short comment why this is needed? I know why but just for
>>> future generations which will wonder: "why do we need to disable the IRQ
>>> while suspending?" :). Especially that this is rather a workaround for
>>> issue in other driver (I2C bus).
>>>
>>
>> Good idea, I'll add a comment here on next version so code archaeologists can
>> figure out what what's going on here.
> 
> Is the disable_irq() needed if you have
> <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4421891/>?
> 

Probably not but I added the following comment:

	/*
	 * The IRQ must be disabled during suspend since due wakeup
	 * ordering issues it may be possible that the I2C controller
	 * is still suspended when the interrupt happens so the IRQ
	 * handler will fail to read the I2C bus.
	 */
	disable_irq(max77802->irq);

since in theory this PMIC can be used in other SoCs besides
Exynos5420/Exynos5800 and it may be possible that the I2C controller driver for
these other SoCs may not resume at noirq time.

But on a second thought, this PMIC seems to be designed specially for these two
Exynos SoCs so I guess it's safe to assume that it is not needed?

Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/