[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140626133428.4909e53a@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 13:34:28 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFA][PATCH 18/27] sparc64,ftrace: Remove check of obsolete
variable function_trace_stop
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:52:39 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> Nothing sets function_trace_stop to disable function tracing anymore.
> Remove the check for it in the arch code.
>
> [ Please test this on your arch ]
>From the cover letter, you were not Cc'd on.
Anyway, as there is no more reason to set function_trace_stop it is time
to remove it. Unfortunately it's in several archs in assembly. Most of
the assembly looks rather straight forward and I removed them myself.
But I was only able to compile test them (for archs: arm64, metag, and
microblaze I do not have my cross tools set up for them and did not
even compile test it). But I would really love it if people can
download their patch and test it out. You only need the patches that go
against your arch and to really test it, also include the patch titled:
ftrace: Remove check for HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACE_MCOUNT_TEST
Otherwise your arch patch will call the list op that still does the
check. That is, if you want to test suspend and resume on your arch.
As you may see, there are patches to the ftrace infrastructure that
depend on the arch patches being implemented. I removed the
functionality from the infrastructure, then removed it from the archs,
and then finally removed the existence of the function_trace_stop
variable, which would cause the archs to fail to compile if that were
to go first.
If you can test your arch and give me your acked-by, I would appreciate
it. Otherwise, if you need this to go through your tree, I would ask you
to set up a dedicated branch that I can pull from to keep this order
intact.
-- Steve
>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> ---
> arch/sparc/Kconfig | 1 -
> arch/sparc/lib/mcount.S | 10 ++--------
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/Kconfig b/arch/sparc/Kconfig
> index 29f2e988c56a..abd7d5575a7d 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/sparc/Kconfig
> @@ -55,7 +55,6 @@ config SPARC64
> select HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER
> select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
> select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST
> - select HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACE_MCOUNT_TEST
> select HAVE_KRETPROBES
> select HAVE_KPROBES
> select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE if SMP
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/lib/mcount.S b/arch/sparc/lib/mcount.S
> index 3ad6cbdc2163..0b0ed4d34219 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/lib/mcount.S
> +++ b/arch/sparc/lib/mcount.S
> @@ -24,10 +24,7 @@ mcount:
> #ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
> /* Do nothing, the retl/nop below is all we need. */
> #else
> - sethi %hi(function_trace_stop), %g1
> - lduw [%g1 + %lo(function_trace_stop)], %g2
> - brnz,pn %g2, 2f
> - sethi %hi(ftrace_trace_function), %g1
> + sethi %hi(ftrace_trace_function), %g1
> sethi %hi(ftrace_stub), %g2
> ldx [%g1 + %lo(ftrace_trace_function)], %g1
> or %g2, %lo(ftrace_stub), %g2
> @@ -80,11 +77,8 @@ ftrace_stub:
> .globl ftrace_caller
> .type ftrace_caller,#function
> ftrace_caller:
> - sethi %hi(function_trace_stop), %g1
> mov %i7, %g2
> - lduw [%g1 + %lo(function_trace_stop)], %g1
> - brnz,pn %g1, ftrace_stub
> - mov %fp, %g3
> + mov %fp, %g3
> save %sp, -176, %sp
> mov %g2, %o1
> mov %g2, %l0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists