| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1403749983.7977.6.camel@joe-AO725> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 19:33:03 -0700 From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> To: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org> Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, gregkh@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/checkpatch.pl: Only emit LONG_LINE for --strict On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 19:24 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 05:05:07PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 08:46 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > Regardless of the long-standing debate over line width, checkpatch > > > should not warn about it by default. > > > > I'm not getting involved here. > > I don't care much one way or another. [] > I'm not asking you to get involved in the Great Line Length Debate; > that's why I didn't attempt to patch CodingStyle or similar. However, I > think it makes sense for *checkpatch* to stop emitting this warning. I think checkpatch should encourage people to write code in a style that matches CodingStyle as well as the predominant styles used in the rest of the kernel. > I'm hoping that Greg will chime in, as the maintainer of staging and the > recipient of a huge number of checkpatch-motivated patches. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists