lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140626203411.GA19179@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Thu, 26 Jun 2014 13:34:11 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, satoru.takeuchi@...il.com,
	shuah.kh@...sung.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.15 00/61] 3.15.2-stable review

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 03:09:13PM -0400, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 04:31:00PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 06/24/2014 08:50 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.15.2 release.
> > >There are 61 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > >to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > >let me know.
> > >
> > >Responses should be made by Thu Jun 26 15:49:36 UTC 2014.
> > >Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > 
> > Build results:
> > 	total: 144 pass: 136 skipped: 5 fail: 3
> > Failed builds:
> > 	powerpc:allmodconfig (binutils 2.23)
> > 	powerpc:allmodconfig (binutils 2.24)
> > 	unicore32:defconfig
> > 
> > Qemu tests all passed.
> > 
> > Results are as expected. Again, unicore32:defconfig would be an easy fix if so desired.
> 
> Thanks for testing all of these.
> 
> As the maintainer of the architecture doesn't seem to care about
> unicore32, I don't see the need to spend any time / effort on it either
> :(
> 
Well, at least it's building in mainline now. Of course, in a sense
you are right, it wasn't the maintainer providing the fixes.

Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ