linux-kernel - Re: Stricter module param and sysfs permission checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <loom.20140626T044310-195@post.gmane.org>
Date:	Thu, 26 Jun 2014 02:54:59 +0000 (UTC)
From:	Gobinda Charan Maji <gobinda.cemk07@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Stricter module param and sysfs permission checks

Gobinda Charan Maji <gobinda.cemk07 <at> gmail.com> writes:



> 
> Hi All,
> 
> As per the newly added restriction (User perms >= group perms >= other 
> perms) is concerned, there is an inconsistency in the permission. Say for 
> example, permission value is "0432". Here User has only READ permission 
> whereas Group has both WRITE and EXECUTE permission and Other has WRITE 
> permission. I think it is not good to give Group and Other at least WRITE 
> permission whereas User itself has no WRITE permission.
> 
> May be, it's better to check those three permissions bit wise rather than 
as 
> a whole. Please rethink about my point and let me know your opinion.
> 
> Thanks,
> Gobinda
> 
> 

Hi All,

I could not get any response yet.

Hi Rusty,

Please at least give me a reply even if my concept seems to be incorrect to 
you.

Thanks in advance,
Gobinda




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/